Legal trainee in Passau: Connections to the extreme right are causing a stir!
A legal trainee at the Passau regional court has been criticized for connections to the extreme right. How is this handled?

Legal trainee in Passau: Connections to the extreme right are causing a stir!
In an explosive case, a prospective lawyer is causing a stir because he was actively involved in right-wing extremist circles and maintains contacts with extremist organizations during his legal traineeship at the Passau regional court. Reports show that this legal trainee was active in various right-wing extremist publications and has appeared for the Identitarian Movement in the past. An extraordinary circumstance that raises questions about the suitability of law students that do not seem to be in line with the values of the basic democratic order.
The BR reports that this case is also in the context of a fundamental decision by the Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG), which ruled six months ago that people who actively fight against the state and its constitution should be excluded from legal training. This ruling is particularly important because it sets new standards in the discussion about the suitability of lawyers and points to the need for strict examination of applicants.
Commitment and connections to the extreme right
The Passau legal trainee has proven connections to the Saxonia-Czernowitz fraternity and to the Danubia fraternity, which is monitored by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution. According to reports, he has scaled back his public involvement in right-wing extremist media, but there are still indications of ongoing contacts with the extreme right. A photo of him at a meeting of the Identitarian Movement underscores these connections and raises the question of the extent to which such networks threaten the integrity of legal education.
Statements by Justice Minister Georg Eisenreich show that the case is complex due to the personal rights of the trainee lawyer concerned. The minister emphasizes that applicants are also checked for membership in extremist organizations, but Toni Schuberl from the Greens criticizes that this check is usually inadequate and the process is considered too superficial. This debate sheds a harsh light on the effectiveness and rigor of law student admissions criteria.
Legal framework and political reactions
The problem is additionally illuminated by past judgments, such as the “Legal trainee III. Weg” case, which caused a sensation in Saxony. Here the Saxon Constitutional Court decided that an applicant's criminal offenses were too long ago to serve as a reason for rejection. A judgment that received vehement criticism because it contradicts the case law of the BVerfG, which demands a clear duty of loyalty to the constitution for lawyers. Loud LTO This could also lead to an intensive debate in Bavaria about the need for legal adjustments.
The Passau case shows how urgently there is a need for a nationwide regulation on the suitability of lawyers in order to ensure the integrity of the judiciary and loyalty to the values of the free-democratic basic order. While political parties continue to put pressure on the state government, it remains unclear how this case should be legally assessed, especially if candidates are involved in extremism. The coming weeks will show how the judicial and political landscape responds to this challenge.