35-year-old attacks lifeguard in Kraiburg natural pool!

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

A man from Mühldorf am Inn attacked a lifeguard in the Kraiburg natural pool. House ban and legal consequences are imminent.

Ein Mann aus Mühldorf am Inn attackierte im Kraiburger Naturbad einen Bademeister. Hausverbot und rechtliche Konsequenzen stehen bevor.
A man from Mühldorf am Inn attacked a lifeguard in the Kraiburg natural pool. House ban and legal consequences are imminent.

35-year-old attacks lifeguard in Kraiburg natural pool!

An alarming incident occurred in the Kraiburg natural pool on June 19, 2025, which was a moment of shock for many swimmers. A 32-year-old man from the Mühldorf am Inn district went to the site despite an existing ban. That reported Innsalzach24.

At around 2:30 p.m., when the man entered the swimming pool, water rescue workers became aware of the uninvited guest. They immediately asked him to leave the area. However, the 32-year-old reacted aggressively and tried to kick a lifeguard, who was just able to avoid the attack and was uninjured. People present were not only insulted by the man, but also threatened. Before the police arrived, the suspect managed to escape.

House ban and legal framework

But what exactly does a stay-at-home ban mean and who can issue it? In a swimming pool, this right is usually exercised by the manager of the facility or his representatives. The legal background for house bans is set out in the Civil Code (BGB), in particular in paragraphs 858 and 859. In general, house bans can be issued both verbally and in writing, although a written form is recommended for evidentiary reasons. That also explains Herfurtner law firm.

A stay-at-home order is usually ordered as a protective mechanism for operators to ensure the integrity of their premises. In the event of non-compliance, the owners of the property rights are entitled to ask the person to leave the property and, if necessary, can call the police. In the event of serious violations, this can also lead to civil and criminal penalties.

Reactions and outlook

In this context, the opening of several criminal proceedings against the 32-year-old is unavoidable. The man's identity was determined through witness statements, which now enables the investigating authorities to take serious steps. Either way, a stay-at-home order is not just a personal measure, but also protects the community and its rights to safety and order in public facilities. How the man can defend himself against the ban is uncertain, as there is no formal legal remedy against it Ask a lawyer notes.

It remains to be seen whether similar incidents will occur in the future or whether swimming pool visitors will now react more sensitively to safety issues. One thing is certain: such an incident never has a place in a relaxed bathing environment.