Suche
Mein Konto
Ex-boyfriend breaks into Hallbergmoos: furniture robbery or misunderstanding?
Two men in Hallbergmoos fail to pick up furniture after a break-in. Police clarify civil dispute, trespassing complaint.
Ex-boyfriend breaks into Hallbergmoos: furniture robbery or misunderstanding?
The Neufahrn police caused a stir in Hallbergmoos on Wednesday. Two gentlemen were clearly looking for furniture and came with a hammer to gain entry to a neighboring house. At 7 a.m., an alert resident heard suspicious noises and informed the police after hearing the clink of broken glass. Only a short time later, several police patrols arrived at the crime scene on Tassiloweg and discovered the men who had just broken the glass on the patio door. Surprisingly, however, it turned out that this was not a case of classic burglars, but rather a sensitive civil law dispute.
As the South German newspaper According to reports, one of the men was previously in a relationship with the resident of the house. At the time of the incident he was going to collect furniture that appeared to be his. Unfortunately, his ex-partner didn't show up for the agreed appointment and he didn't have the key to legally get into the apartment. He still tried to open the patio door with a hammer, which ultimately caused damage.
Legal consequences for men
The situation quickly escalated and the police had to report the two men for trespassing and criminal damage. Despite the delicate circumstances, they were unable to take any furniture with them. The ownership and ownership claims could not be clarified on site, which required the intervention of the Hallbergmoos Volunteer Fire Department. This secured the patio door to protect the contents of the apartment from further damage.
As far as legal guilt is concerned, Section 123 of the Criminal Code constitutes trespassing, which is in competition with other crimes. In cases of forced entry, there is often an interplay of various crimes, such as possible damage to property according to Section 303. According to the Law Academy It is often the case that trespassing occurs when the person concerned is also the person who was stolen from.
In this case, the police had to act quickly and efficiently as the emotional ties between those involved further complicated the situation. The event illustrates how legal questions are often not easy to answer in amorphous conflicts, and that unpleasant scenarios can sometimes arise when personal differences meet financial demands.